Fairfax Virginia Reckless Driving Divorce DUI Traffic Child Custody Laws|Lawyer County

Prostitution Arrests Virginia Fairfax

Prostitution Arrest Defense – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Prostitution Arrest in Virginia.

If you have been charged with a Prostitution Arrest in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Prostitution Arrest Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the experience and skills necessary to assist you.

Prostitution Arrests Virginia Fairfax
Prostitution Arrests Virginia Fairfax

Karts v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendants were convicted of loitering for prostitution in Fairfax Virginia. Defendants filed motions to dismiss the convictions contending that the provisions were unconstitutionally void for vagueness. The court held that, in assessing the constitutionality of a statute, it was required to presume that the legislative action was valid and further found that the burden was on the challenger to demonstrate the constitutional defect. The court determined that in order for a law to avoid over-breadth and vagueness attacks, it must have provided a person of ordinary intelligence with a reasonable opportunity to know what behavior was prohibited and provide explicit standards for those who applied them. The court further held that the statute contained no protection from the police employing their own bias in enforcing the provision, which allowed arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. The court granted defendants’ motions.

If you are facing a criminal case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Over-breadth attacks are successful when the challenged statute is not drawn narrowly enough so that the statute’s sweep encompasses protected speech or association.
  • Due process requires that a penal statute be defined sufficiently by its terms so as to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute. Enforcement standards and procedures must be objective to guide police in order to prevent arbitrary and capricious arrests based on their own idea of right and wrong.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Prostitution Arrest Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the experience and skills necessary to assist you.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia Penalties Child Sexual Abuse Fairfax

Penalties For Child Sexual Abuse Charge – Virginia Lawyers

If you are dealing with the Penalties For Child Sexual Abuse charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Penalties For Child Sexual Abuse Charge defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Virginia Penalties Child Sexual Abuse Fairfax
Virginia Penalties Child Sexual Abuse Fairfax

Kart v. Commonwealth

Facts:

The Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) convicted appellant inmate of sodomy and imposed penalties. His appeals were denied. He filed a writ of actual innocence based on non-biological evidence, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-327.10. His request to refer the case to the circuit court for an evidentiary hearing was denied. The Court of Appeals of Virginia dismissed the petition. The inmate was awarded an appeal.

If you are facing a criminal case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • For purposes of a writ of actual innocence, traditionally, courts view recantations with “great suspicion.” Skepticism about recantations is especially applicable in cases of child sexual abuse where recantation is a recurring phenomenon. Recantation evidence is generally questionable in character and is widely viewed by courts with suspicion because of the obvious opportunities and temptations for fraud. Unless proven true, recantation evidence merely amounts to an attack on a witness’s credibility by the witness herself. Such skepticism increases with the passage of time. Recantation evidence appearing long after the trial has ended places the opposing party at a disadvantage similar to that which justifies statutes of limitations. Memories may have faded, witnesses may have disappeared or become incapable of testifying, physical evidence may be unrecoverable and the recanting witness may have had ample time to acquire an extraneous motive to falsify his original testimony.
  • Although the term “material” has different meanings in other contexts, within the context of Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-327.11(A), evidence supporting a petition for a writ of actual innocence based on non-biological evidence must be true. Manifestly, evidence that is false cannot be “material” under the terms of the statute.
  • A petitioner seeking a writ of actual innocence based on non-biological evidence has the burden of proving to the Court of Appeals, by clear and convincing evidence, that the witnesses’ recantations are true, that the evidence upon which he relies could not have been timely discovered by the exercise of due diligence and is not merely cumulative, corroborative or collateral, and that, weighing all the evidence in the record against that which he contends to be newly discovered and previously unavailable, no rational trier of fact could have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-327.13.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Penalties For Child Sexual Abuse Charge defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 Possession Lawyers Fairfax

VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 charge.

If you are dealing with an a VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 charge, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 defense.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 Possession Lawyers Fairfax
VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 Possession Lawyers Fairfax

Robinson v. Commonwealth

Facts:

The Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) convicted defendant on twenty-four counts of possession of child pornography, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.1:1 and sentenced him to twenty-four months in prison. Defendant appealed.

If you are facing a Child Porn case in VA, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The VA Court made the following holding:

  • In order to convict a defendant of possession of child pornography, the Commonwealth is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly possessed any sexually explicit visual material utilizing or having as a subject a person less than 18 years. Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.1:1.
  • An ex post facto law has been defined as any statute which punishes as a crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done; which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with crime of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed. The mark of an ex post facto law is the imposition of what can fairly be designated punishment for past acts.
  • On appeal from a criminal conviction, the Court of Appeals of VA will only consider those arguments presented in the petition for appeal and granted by said court.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

VA Child Porn 18.2-374.1:1 defense.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Sexual Assault Minor Internet Virginia Fairfax

Sexual Assault Of A Minor & Internet Sex Crime Charge – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Sexual Assault Of A Minor & An Internet Sex Crime Charge In Virginia.

If you are dealing with a Sexual Assault Of A Minor & An Internet Sex Crime Charge In Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Sexual Assault Of A Minor & An Internet Sex Crime Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Sexual Assault Minor Internet Virginia Fairfax
Sexual Assault Minor Internet Virginia Fairfax

Fairfax Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-374.3

Alford v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant challenged a judgment of the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia), which convicted him of computer solicitation of a minor in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.3, and attempted indecent liberties (sexual assault) with a minor in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-370. Defendant argued the trial court erred in precluding him from eliciting testimony from witnesses that after he showed them a photograph of the victim he believed he was chatting with on the internet, they told him that the victim was likely in her mid-twenties. He contended that that testimony would have shown he lacked the requisite criminal intent. The court of appeals held that assuming without deciding that the trial court erred in precluding defendant from inquiring of his three witnesses what they said concerning the victim’s age, any error was harmless because defendant told the police after his arrest that he believed the victim was only fourteen to fifteen years old. That evidence plainly rebutted any inference that defendant thought he was pursuing an adult. Given defendant admission that he thought the victim could have been fourteen, along with repeated references during internet chats to the victim’s age of thirteen, any error did not affect the jury verdict.

If you are facing a criminal case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • A conviction for computer solicitation of a minor under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.3(B) requires the prosecution to prove a defendant acted for procuring or promoting the use of a minor for certain illegal activities.
  • A conviction for attempted indecent liberties with a minor under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-370 requires the Commonwealth to prove a defendant attempted to commit sexually related acts with a person under the age of 15 years.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Sexual Assault Of A Minor & An Internet Sex Crime Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia Reckless Driving State Law 46.2-862 Fairfax

Reckless Driving State Law – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for violating the reckless driving state laws in Virginia.

If you are dealing with a violation of the reckless driving state laws in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Virginia Reckless Driving State Law 46.2-862 Fairfax
Virginia reckless driving State Law 46.2-862 Fairfax

Reckless driving state laws In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Warner v. Commonwealth

Facts:

A jury in the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) convicted defendant of reckless driving by speed, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862. Defendant appealed. Defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying her proposed jury instruction that improper driving, an offense set forth in Virginia state traffic laws, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-869, was a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed. The appellate court disagreed. Improper driving was not a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed. Every commission of <a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VA”>reckless driving by speed did not also constitute improper driving. In addition, improper driving was not composed entirely of the elements of reckless driving by speed. Improper driving required an additional finding of slight culpability, an element excluded from § 46.2-862.

If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The plain and unambiguous reading of the improper driving statute, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862, makes clear that authority rests with the trial judge and not the jury to make the lesser degree of culpability determination. In the alternative, an attorney for the Commonwealth may reduce a reckless driving charge to improper driving at any time prior to the court’s decision. Thus, only the trial judge, or the prosecutor before the verdict is rendered, has the prerogative to reduce a reckless driving charge to improper driving under § 46.2-869.
  • A reviewing court’s responsibility in reviewing jury instructions is to see that the law has been clearly stated and that the instructions cover all issues which the evidence fairly raises.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Reckless driving state laws In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia 46.2-852 Reckless Driving Fairfax

46.2-852 Reckless Driving – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a 46.2-852 Reckless Driving charge in Virginia.

If you are dealing with 46.2-852 Reckless Driving in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

46.2-852 Reckless Driving Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Virginia 46.2-852 Reckless Driving Fairfax
Virginia 46.2-852 Reckless Driving Fairfax

Prince v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant appealed from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Fairfax (Virginia), which, after a bench trial, convicted her of reckless driving. The sole issue presented by the appeal was whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant drove a vehicle recklessly on a highway in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852. The court found that the evidence was insufficient and reversed the conviction. The court held that under the facts shown by the record, the Commonwealth failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, who had fallen asleep at the wheel after drinking alcoholic beverages, was guilty of reckless driving in violation of § 46.2-852.

If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852 provides that, irrespective of the maximum speeds permitted by law, any person who drives a vehicle on any highway recklessly or at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person shall be guilty of <a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-863-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="<a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VA”>reckless driving Fairfax County VA”>reckless driving.
  • The word “recklessly” as used in Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852 imparts a disregard by the driver of a motor vehicle for the consequences of his act and an indifference to the safety of life, limb or property. The essence of the offense of reckless driving lies not in the act of operating a vehicle, but in the manner and circumstances of its operation.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

46.2-852 <a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VIrginia”>reckless driving Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Virginia 46.2-862 Reckless Driving Fairfax

46.2-862 Reckless Driving – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a 46.2-862 Reckless Driving charge in Virginia.

If you are dealing with a 46.2-862 Reckless Driving in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

46.2-862 Reckless Driving Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Virginia 46.2-862 Reckless Driving Fairfax
Virginia 46.2-862 Reckless Driving Fairfax

Virginia 46.2-862 Loudoun Reckless Driving Lawyers Speed Violation

Dania v. Commonwealth

Facts:

A jury in the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) convicted defendant of reckless driving by speed, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862. Defendant appealed. Defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying her proposed jury instruction that improper driving, an offense set forth in Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-869, was a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed. The appellate court disagreed. Improper driving was not a lesser-included offense of <a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VA”>reckless driving by speed. Every commission of reckless driving by speed did not also constitute improper driving. In addition, improper driving was not composed entirely of the elements of reckless driving by speed. Improper driving required an additional finding of slight culpability, an element excluded from § 46.2-862.

If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • For a defendant to be found guilty of reckless driving by speed under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862, the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant was driving on a highway in the Commonwealth, and was driving (i) at a speed of twenty miles per hour or more in excess of the applicable maximum speed limit or (ii) in excess of eighty miles per hour regardless of the applicable maximum speed limit..
  • Improper driving, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-869, is not a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862. Every commission of reckless driving by speed does not also constitute a commission of improper driving. In addition, improper driving is not composed entirely of the elements of reckless driving by speed. Improper driving requires an additional finding of slight culpability, an element excluded from the reckless driving by speed statute.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

46.2-862 Reckless Driving Defense In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Appeal Reckless Driving Conviction Virginia Fairfax

Appeal Reckless Driving Conviction – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia.

If you are dealing with an Appeal Of A Reckless Driving Conviction In Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Appeal Reckless Driving Conviction In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Appeal Reckless Driving Conviction Virginia Fairfax
Appeal Reckless Driving Conviction Virginia Fairfax

Pollard v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant appealed a judgment by the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) that convicted him of reckless driving, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852; defendant claimed that a United States Park police officer had no authority to stop him for speeding on an interstate. On appeal the court found that, even if the officer had no authority to stop defendant for speeding on the interstate, defendant’s reckless driving was a separate and distinct offense occurring after the original traffic stop had concluded. Therefore, the trial court did not err in defendant’s conviction of <a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VIrginia”><a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VA”>reckless driving under § 46.2-852

If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • An appellate court decides cases ‘on the best and narrowest ground available.'” Luginbyhl v. Commonwealth, 48 Va. App. 58, 64, 628 S.E.2d 74, 77 (2006) (en banc) (quoting Air Courier Conference v. Am. Postal Workers Union, 498 U.S. 517, 531, 111 S. Ct. 913, 112 L. Ed. 2d 1125 (1991) (Stevens, J., concurring)). Assuming without deciding that Shannon had no authority to stop appellant for speeding on Interstate 395, we need not address this issue because appellant’s reckless driving was a separate and distinct offense occurring after the original traffic stop had concluded.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Appeal Reckless Driving Conviction In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyers Fairfax

Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Charge – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Charge.

If you are dealing with a Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Charge, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Charge

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyers Fairfax
Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyers Fairfax

Williams v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Williams was driving on a highway in Marion, in excess of eighty miles per hour. As a result, Williams was issued a summons for reckless driving by speed. A jury in the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia) convicted defendant of reckless driving by speed, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862. Defendant appealed.

If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • For a defendant to be found guilty of reckless driving by speed under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862, the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant was driving on a highway in the Commonwealth, and was driving (i) at a speed of twenty miles per hour or more in excess of the applicable maximum speed limit or (ii) in excess of eighty miles per hour regardless of the applicable maximum speed limit.
  • Improper driving, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-869, is not a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862. Every commission of reckless driving by speed does not also constitute a commission of improper driving. In addition, improper driving is not composed entirely of the elements of reckless driving by speed. Improper driving requires an additional finding of slight culpability, an element excluded from the reckless driving by speed statute.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Marion Virginia Reckless Driving Charge

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Court Appeal Reckless Driving Virginia Fairfax

Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving Charge – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia.

If you are dealing with a Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving charge in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Court Appeal Reckless Driving Virginia Fairfax
Court Appeal Reckless Driving Virginia Fairfax

Luther Sr. v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted for drunk driving and for reckless driving. On appeal, the court affirmed. The court held that the two convictions did not violate Va. Code Ann. § 19-232, which prohibited two convictions for the same act, because defendant was driving drunk and was driving recklessly, two acts that were not necessarily part and parcel of the same act. The court also held that the defendant could not challenge the trial court’s denial of the state’s motion to sever the charges because defendant did not object to the trial court’s ruling at the time it was entered. The court further held that defendant could not obtain a mistrial based on prejudicial testimony that defendant’s counsel elicited through questions on cross-examination.

If you are facing a traffic case in Fairfax, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:
  • Va. Code Ann. § 19-232 reads that if the same act be a violation of two or more statutes or of two or more municipal ordinances or of one or more statutes and also one or more ordinances, conviction under one of such statutes or ordinances shall be a bar to a prosecution or proceeding under the other or others. Furthermore, if the same act be a violation of both a State and a federal statute a prosecution or proceeding under the federal statute shall be a bar to a prosecution or proceeding under the State statute.
  • It frequently has been held that reckless driving and driving while under the influence of intoxicants, where both are involved in the same occurrence, are separate acts and therefore constitute separate offenses, and the prosecution for one offense is no bar to a prosecution for that coupled with it.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Richmond Virginia Beach Loudoun Prince William Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.

Court Appeal Of A <a href='http://srislawyer.com/reckless-driving-in-virginia/reckless-driving-virginia-lawyer-46-2-865-fairfax-richmond-beach-prince-william-loudoun-fredericksburg-lynchburg/' title="reckless driving In Fairfax VA”>reckless driving charge in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Fairfax Court House Detail:

Fairfax Circuit Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County General District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030.

Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4110 Chain Bridge Road,
Fairfax, VA 22030-4020.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Scroll To Top